
The poll in which we asked you to vote whether LEM should implement a new approach for the evaluation of virtual assets and the security of sharehodler equity ended recently. 60% voted yes, among them our major shareholders. As a result we will bring this new evaluation in place and take measures to protect the shareholder equity in case of failure.
Only 10 persons participated in the vote what I think is an amazingly low ratio compared to the 70 shareholders we count. We could have expected a better participation. Does this means that a bigger part of the shareholder's community simply doesn't care about virtual company evaluation or protection of the shareholder equity? We cannot answer this question. For us the evaluation of the assets of LEM and the protection of the shareholder equity has a mere ethical dimension. It makes a difference for us whether you tell a potential investor, "you have to consider that if you give us money all can be lost" or we say, "you trust us money, so we take measures to protect the shareholder equity as best as we can and take a moral commitment if things would go wrong".
Such is exactly as we will proceed. In the future and the first time for the financial report of 2Q2012 we will proceed as follows:
Liquidation reserve
The most important measure is the protection of shareholder capital. We studied different possibilities. To keep things easy we will build up a cash position at PayPal till it reaches the nominative capital of LEM. As we have 2 mio shares with a nominative value of 0.5 $L per share that gives an equity captial of 1 mio $L. We hope to build up this liquidation reserve within the next two quarters. It looks as we won't have a bad next quarter which permits us to work straight forward in this direction. The liquidation reserve will find a seperate entry in our financial report, the first time for the 2Q2012.
In case of a liquidation that liquidation reserve would entirely be at disposal of the shareholders. You have to add to this the other assets like shares, participation, intangible assets etc which would be sold and would also contribute to the liquidation dividend.
You can criticize that a liquidation reserve is also not safe at Paypal and out of control of the ordinary shareholder. However, we think it makes an ethical difference whether we put the liquidation reserve in our financial report and show a commitment to it, or we just let the shareholders bear all the risks - "we have told you before that you might lose everything"... lol. Also, and this is an important point, the liquidation reserve will be outside CAPX and SL. RL is still a more stable environment then SL....
Portfolio evaluation
- SL goods: 25% of the sale price in SL
- Real estate in SL is estimated with 50% of current evaluations in world. Right now ca,. 125'000 $L per SIM.
- Cash: 90% of the value in $L
- Shares at virtual stock exchanges: 10% of market price
- RL equipment: No value as not addressable in a liquidation
- Intangible assets & goodwill: No value if no prove can be given
The profitability of LEM might be harmed a bit by these measures, but on the benefit of more security. And be assured that we are not planning to liquidate LEM ...
Again, happy trading
Greetz
Casper Trebuchet
LEM, chairman

